It certainly wasn’t a quiet afternoon for Stefano Buttafuocothe correspondent of Summer live who was attacked along with his crew. Gianluca Semprini And Nunzia De Girolamo they were shocked by the terrible episode in which their collaborator was the protagonist. The journalist attempted to gather the impressions of a man accused of having kept the body of his mother who died of natural causes in the freezer with the aim of continuing to receive his pension.
Shock to Estate live for the attack on correspondent Stefano Buttafuoco
Just a week after an attack suffered by a correspondent from Summer live in the afternoon a new terrible episode occurred which left the Rai studio speechless. According to what was told to the worried conductors Gianluca Semprini and Nunzia De Girolamo the correspondent Stefano Buttafuoco he was threatened while he and his crew were engaged in an outdoor event. The journalist attempted to collect the statements of a man who, with the intention of defrauding the INPS to continue enjoying his mother’s pension, did not hesitate to hide the body of the deceased woman in 82 years old in one’s own freezer. In fact, just today he was sentenced to one year and eight months in prison, to which is added the payment of 9,900 euros to be paid to the INPS. In addition to verbally attacking the crew, the old woman’s son, as he himself said Buttfire, even attempted to set his dogs on the staff of Viale Mazzini. Despite the scare, however, the correspondent wanted to reassure the studio and the hosts about his conditions, this time in fact there were no physical consequences but only a great fear.
Yet another attack on a troupe of Gianluca Semprini and Nunzia De Girolamo
The attack suffered by Stefano Buttafuoco arrives a few days after the one that occurred against his colleague Summer live Ercole Rocchetti. In this case the Rai correspondent was busy on the case linked to the disappearance of Mara Favro when he was violently forced away with the entire crew by a man who did not hesitate to punch their car. It was the woman’s employer who threatened them in such a violent way that, according to the reconstruction of Bobbinswould have gone into a rage due to the discovery of the correspondent with a name different from the one given so far and behind whom there would not be a splendid past.
