The commentator Paolo Condò underlines how the Rossoneri were almost on the safe side by choosing the former Roma.
Paolo Condò to Radio Rossoneri talked about Paulo Fonseca perhaps even going against the grain. “I too had lost sight of Fonseca a bit after Roma, but when Milan came out I tried to remember the things I saw in the capital, where there were several good things, and then in general his career”.
The status of Portuguese
“Fonseca is a coach who, when he had the team to win, won, Shakhtar, and when he had the team to place, he placed, from Roma to Lille. Are all coaches like this? Actually no, some manage to invent something to raise the level. Fonseca up to this moment he obtained quite mathematical results“.
The comparisons
“But if I go and see what’s happening this summer, I see that it’s a pretty revolutionary summer when it comes to the bench. From Bayern to Chelsea, up to Borussia Dortmund a few days ago, the equation that a high-level bench requires an established high-level coach has completely blown up this year. To the Chelseathe club that spent the most in the last season, a coach has arrived, Enzo Maresca, who only made one promotion from the Championship to the Premier League. He also achieved the same result, but then followed by a relegation Kompanytaken from Bayern Monaco. And then also the Borussia Dortmund Champions League finalist, after Terzic’s farewell, he signed Sahinin his first real job as a coach.”
The paradox
“It is therefore clear that faced with these choices, Fonseca falls into the range of almost conservative choices: Milan have hired a well-known coach, who is not a leap in the dark like the three names I have just mentioned“.
