(ARC) Trieste Cable Car: Scoccimarro, we do not accept ideological opposition

(AGENPARL) – Rome, 24 June 2024

(AGENPARL) – Mon 24 June 2024 The councilor reiterated that the issue? technique and what it gives
we always listen to the territories
Trieste, 24 June – “As a regional councilor I have always
adopted the line of listening to both the community? both his
administrators, what? as the entire council has always done
regional. I and my colleagues in the Executive do not accept
ideological oppositions”.
There? ? what the defense councilor wanted to clarify
of the environment, energy and sustainable development of Friuli Venezia
Giulia, regarding some positions against the work of the
Region in the matter of the Trieste gondola lift.
“On the procedure relating to the cable car infrastructure – ha
explained Scoccimarro – ? It’s worth pointing out that there are degrees
supra-regional: the national one first and then the European one
for Pnrr funds. These are steps that have a process
evaluation of the project, on which the Region also intervenes,
but it does so technically and administratively speaking, not for
position taken towards a minority established in
committee. Me? it seemed evident right from the start that the
political exploitation has greatly affected the
overall evaluation of the work, going beyond the technicalities? And
leading to ideological stances.”
“The technicians who are managing the procedure have given their opinion
third level Vinca positive technician: they are people
formed, they have four legislatures behind them, competences
proven and experienced: we rely on them with great confidence –
added Scoccimarro -. Following a third party complaint to the
Regional Administrative Court (Tar), the same body yes
? pronounced with a sentence on which we have adapted the
council resolution. Now we await the next degrees of
judgment. It must be said that, as far as the Region is concerned, that is
for the four central directorates and for the legal profession, we have one
urban planning variant that can be done? realize. For those who feed
perplexity? is there? the possibility? to deal with technicians
professionals while we cannot accept a sterile and
harmful ideological criticism”.
“Moving on to the process of assessing the impact of III
Level for the variant to the general municipal master plan of
municipal level “Northern access: mobility? systematic and tourist”
which involves the construction of a cableway system for the
transport of people between Opicina and the city center? of Trieste, a
following the TAR rulings of Fvg 199 and 200, published on the 29th
May 2024, yes? deemed necessary to proceed with the revocation of the
Regional Resolution 784/2024 of the same date and resume the
proceeding in compliance with the provisions of the TAR”.
detailed Scoccimarro.
“In agreement between the various central departments involved and with the
support of Asugi and Arpa – added Scoccimarro -, yes?
proceeded to evaluate the existence of the requirements from scratch
necessary for a potential positive evaluation
of the intervention, namely: the lack of alternatives
practicable transport systems and correspondingly only partially
assessable from the point of view of environmental impact; there
strategic? of the Variant for the purposes of pursuing the framework
of regional policies aimed at protecting fundamental values ​​for
the lives of citizens as well as health, for public safety
for the reduction of the social cost of accidents, and for
the environment with the reduction of Co2 production;
the adequacy of the compensation measures proposed by the Municipality
of Trieste”.
Just some of the observations received from the “No cable car committee”
have been partially accepted and in any case all have been
counterargued. Shared between the central managements, the activity
investigation has highlighted that they do not contribute further
cognitive elements that require further investigation
specific. Yes ? therefore proceeded: to revoke the previous one
council resolution n. 784 of 29 May 2024; to believe,
noted the absence of alternative solutions, which the Variant
12 is justified by “reasons related to human health and
to public safety or relating to primary consequences
importance for the environment”, conditions necessary for the exemption
provided for by the art. 1 of the Ministerial Decree of 17 October 2007 to the prohibition of
construction of a cableway system within the nature areas
2000, indicated by the Ministerial Decree himself; to believe that the same
Variant 12 is justified by relevant imperative reasons
public interest, including reasons of a social nature and
economical.
“Yes ? deemed to approve the proposed compensation measures
by the Municipality of Trieste, as modified and integrated with
requirements from the Biodiversity Service: establishment of a new
Natura 2000 Zps site “Bosco Vignano and Laghetti delle Noghere” in
municipalities of Muggia and San Dorligo della Valle-Obcina Dolina e
indication of the first management measures; improvements in favor
of the saproxylic fauna to mitigate the negative impact caused
from the reduction and fragmentation of habitats; to approve the
“Form for the transmission of information to the Community?
European pursuant to art. 6, paragraph 4 of the Directive
Habitat”” concluded the councilor.
ARC/PT/al
241422 JUN 24