During the new episode of Who has seenbroadcast on Wednesday 12 June 2024 on Rai3 and hosted by Federica Sciarellimany cases of missing persons and current and past news events were addressed, such as the one involving Liliana Resinovichwith her husband Sebastiano Visintin in the studio unwilling to answer the presenter’s questions. And again the case of Pierina Paganelli, Mara Favro and the disappearance of Sara Buricelli and her girlfriend Jasmine Rosa, with which Sciarelli opened the episode. Let’s see together what happened live.
Who saw it?, episode of 12 June 2024: what happened
Federica Sciarelli opened the episode with the case of the disappearance of Sara Buricelli and her girlfriend Jasmine Rosa, both 16 years old. Since Tuesday 11 June, nothing more has been known about the two teenagers, and the journalist tried to make a live appeal, inviting the two girls to contact their families: “Your parents are really very worried, they are looking for you and are waiting for a your call or message. Please reach them somehow.” Sara’s last news dates back to 12.40 last Tuesday, when she took the train to Rome, where her girlfriend lives. The girl’s mother last heard from her around 4pm that day: it seems that she was her daughter with Jasmine at that time.
Another case addressed this evening was that of the murder of Pierina Paganelli, the 78-year-old stabbed to death in Rimini on 4 October. He is the one being investigated Louis Dassilvathe 34-year-old neighbor of the woman pressed by a correspondent of the program: “What did you and Manuela Bianchi say to each other when you met in the hotel after Pierina’s murder?“he asked. The man is flanked by the wife and lawyer Valeria Bartoluccialso her husband’s alibi, who at the police station had said: “I have no doubt about my husband’s innocence“. The investigations are continuing and the focus is currently on the analysis of the artefacts found at the crime scene. The 34-year-old’s DNA and fingerprints could lead to a significant breakthrough in the case: is the biological material found in the garage and in particular on certain objects, such as Pierina’s bag, his? We also remember that a couple of weeks ago Louis Dassilva’s wife declared: “At a certain point I realized that the bag of my husband’s dirty clothes was no longer thereso I called Manuela (Pierina’s daughter-in-law and lover of the alleged culprit, ed.) and I asked her: ‘But did you take them? And she: ‘Yes, it was me‘, and I asked her if she had washed them but she said she hadn’t“. Now the necessary checks will be carried out to understand that there are traces of Dassilva’s blood on the victim’s clothes.
There is no shortage of the case of Mara Favro, mother of a 9-year-old girl who disappeared after a work shift in a pizzeria. The brother was in the studio, who thinks that someone made his 51-year-old sister from Susa disappear, who has not been found since March 7th. “I decided to give up the pizzeria. They treat me like a rag but I’m worth much more“: this was the last message sent by the woman to a man she had met in the very place where she worked on WhatsApp at 06:21 on 8 March. An unpublished message that was very important for the time it was sent ( nothing more was heard about her afterwards), even though the friend’s answers never arrived on his cell phone. The brother, who never believed that his sister had left by choice, asked for the truth comes to the surface, in the hope of being able to find his Mara again.
Another much discussed case, especially on social media, is that of Nessy Guerrathe young woman reported by her husband Tamer Hamoud for “adultery” (he only wore a costume) and “homosexuality“. She asked for help from the Italian Consulate in Hurghada, where she took refuge with the little girl, and made an appeal from Egypt, where she is currently stuck for fear that her husband will still hurt her physically, after repeated alleged domestic violence: “My little girl and I find ourselves stuck here and living in terror because Tamer attempted to kidnap her. I ask the show ‘Who saw it?’ to help me return to my country with my little girl“. We discovered live that Tamer said he was “willing to forgive her and drop the charges” if he returned home with the little girl, all after the man had kicked them both out.
Let’s talk about again Kata, the little girl who disappeared on June 10th. The mother was able to see new images, and through her eyes she told what happened next: from a video two men were seen chasing the little girl, and then also a woman who the mother seemed to know well: “Yes, I knew her and in her room there was a Kata toy and a lipstick. Kata initially played with her daughter, but then her friend started hitting her and she became afraid of her. I have reported this several times“. For the Prosecutor of Florence Filippo Spiezia none of these people mentioned are linked to the events that occurred. Then the little witness, a little girl, has spoke of a “wolf” beyond the gate and the latter’s mother explained: “She told me the wolf took her but she walked away“. “The communication that the little girl makes is not so explicit, it alludes to the entry onto the scene of some adult person. It is a relevant fact, it has weight. I reiterate to Kata’s mother that I continue to have faith in the state’s law enforcement agencies. We are aware, if not certain, that some of the people know much more than they say. We can invite them to review their relationship with the judicial authorities“, declared the Chief Prosecutor of Florence. Kata’s mother then made another appeal: “It’s time to say everything that happened, let me know how my daughter is. I don’t care why, why you did it, I just want to hug my daughter again.”.
Tensions between Visentin and Sciarelli
Moments of tension in the studio between Sebastiano Visintin, husband of Liliana Resinovich, and Federica Sciarelli, after discovering that it was the latter who called the presenter to talk about the case: “Forgive me for keeping you waiting, but you told me at the last minute that you were coming. She called me on the phone, saying she wanted to come here. Why?” “I still don’t know what happened to Lilliana for almost 21 months,” the man replied before becoming angry when Sciarelli said: “Sometimes I have the feeling as if it had become a film. The impression is that you and Sterpin have become protagonists. You’re always on television and it’s as if Liliana has been cornered. It’s all disrespectful, even talking about Liliana’s private life“. Visintin responds with a somewhat annoyed tone: “They advise me not to go on TV, but you know what? You go looking for pieces… I have never allowed myself to offend or speak badly of someone. Inhuman things were said, even the termination of a pregnancy… They hurt me“. “Forget it…“, replied the presenter. Then Sciarelli continued to ask for information regarding the past, apologizing to the guest for having forgotten to ask certain questions when it was time: “It was my mistake“, but the man didn’t seem to want to talk about events that had already been explained: “You tell me things that I don’t want to face, these things have been clarified with the Prosecutor’s Office. I don’t want to talk about it, if there are other things to discuss I’m available to answer“. Visintin often tried to divert the discussions, but the presenter always made herself heard: “I ask her a question and she shies away“. The man however blurted out: “I’m not in court“.
Speaking about the telephone number blocked by the guest before going to the Prosecutor’s Office because he had heard a man panting when he answered the call (probably Sterpin, according to the stories his wife told him), Federica Sciarelli asked him: “Could there have been a stalker?“, then adding: “I know you regret coming here…“. Visintin did not hide his thoughts on this matter: “Yes, it’s true… Let’s go back to the Middle Ages. What do you want if I answer you about the past?” The presenter responded in kind: “She gives me the opportunity to ask questions and I ask her“. Shortly afterwards the guest came back to the office: “Tell me about all the things I did wrong? No. I proved all these things, the police station called my son, I showed everything“. Sciarelli pressed him, knowing that it would make him irritated: “Doesn’t your son think you’re involved?” “But what questions are you asking me? These are really heavy questions, I tell you. I can assure you that however there will come a day when we meet, we are not angry at each other“he blurted out.
Immediately afterwards Federica Sciarelli announced: “Sebastiano said that before I leave Who Has Seen It we will do a Special together with Sterpin. I don’t know if it’s a threat or a promise, thanks Sebastiano. He fights with me, but then he’s available“, said the presenter, as if to confirm the latest news on the alleged farewell. A cryptic phrase, hers, which has shaken social media, especially in light of the recent rumors that the presenter, courted by Nove, is about to leave program and Rai, although it could simply be a strategy to get people talking about themselves and Who has seen. “In any case, the day the special happens will mean that Phede will be ready to leave“, “Guys, I’m afraid that what Sciari said about the special with Sterpin was said because it’s senior year“, “Sorry but I’m just thinking about Faith saying “when I leave“: these are some of the comments on social media. It’s still: “Sciary, I don’t know if it’s clear to you… not only will you not be able to leave @chilhavistorai3, but you won’t even be able to retire! You are in #chilhavisto as Petrella is in @ginpretura“, or: “Before I leave Who saw it? sThey are words that should never be spoken. Queen Faith will be in #chilhavisto forever and ever. Amen“, “Sciary’s sentence is very cryptic, Federì at least you don’t play pranks on us“, “Before I leave #chilhavisto”. Federica, don’t let us worry, we want you here with us for a long time to come. #chilhavisters“. Returning to Visintin’s response, he said:”But let’s talk about the new things, the ones that everyone expects to have an answer to“.
Finally, during the episode, the journalist launched a sort of dig at users on social media due to the controversy caused by the use of the term “fragility“, which she often adopted live: “This guy has some problems. I say ‘fragility’, but you understand what I mean“. The jab did not go unnoticed: “Did she just send us a dig because we make fun of her for ‘frailty’?“
