Organizes the Sesante club of Senigallia
“IN THE SIGN OF GIORGIO LA PIRA AND ENRICO MATTEI” is the title of the next meeting of the ANPC Christian Partisans of Senigallia and Valmisa.
These in fact, after the intense and successful meetings of recent months in the city and in the Ostrense area, tthey will compete next Saturday 29th of the month at the Circolo Acli ‘U. Ravetta’ of Senigallia (Piazza del Duomo)as per the attached attachment.
The meeting, in which the best possible participation is hoped and requested, is scheduled for 12.15 pm and highlights various organizational issues that will be decisive for a greater rooting of the Association in the Territory. Among these, also the handover of the Presidency of the Senigallia City District from Franco Porcelli to the young and brilliant lawyer. Carlo Tortarolo (who is also to be considered a ‘son of art’ of Senigallian politics for being the nephew of the famous Giuseppe Catone: an ancient meritorious of the Vatican, of Palazzo Mastai and of the Catholic Movement as he was in the closest circle of the collaborators of Luigi Ged¬da and of the Civic Committees of which he was the diocesan President, and then General Secretary of the Diocesan Council of AC in the years from 1960 to ’68).
This time, however, the entire argumentative itinerary will be developed under the banner of community Personalism and Christian-social Popularism, that is, keeping in mind the moral and political legacy that comes from the unforgettable Giorgio La Pira and Enrico Mattei.
Finally, at the end of the meeting – around 1.30pm – the always welcome RANCIO ‘STRETTO’ PARTIGIANO will arrive (as is customary), upon reservation by the 25th of the month.
For all this interweaving of arguments and motivations, as the poster clearly explains, it is clear that the ANPC of the Senigallian area hopes for the expansion of the invitation to the students of the secondary schools and to fellow citizens willing to commit themselves on the front of values of Resistance and Christian-social popularism, ideally considering them the recipients of their own socio-political ‘witness’.
