In this context, one of the most widespread solutions is that of the digital signature. In the context of collecting signatures for the European elections, Michele Santoro raises the question of the use of digital signatures as a possible solution to simplify and make the process of presenting electoral lists more efficient. Although the digital signature is an easy method to activate – the website letterasenzabusta.com explains how to obtain a digital signature online for free – and widely used in various contexts, Santoro highlights that in the electoral context this practice has not yet been adopted. His observation probably fits into a broader debate on technological innovation and the modernization of electoral processes, with the aim of making the democratic system more accessible and participatory.
Although, as mentioned, digital technologies are increasingly used in various areas of politics, the use of digital signatures during European elections as a tool to implement accessibility and participation in democratic system did not receive the consensus hoped for by Michele Santoro, who pointed out the potential of this solution after the exclusion of Pace Terra Dignità from the North-West Constituency during this year’s European elections. Let’s find out, in the next lines, the details of the story, in order to take stock of the situation on the digital signature and on the vicissitudes highlighted by the politician recently.
Digital signature during the European elections: everything you need to know about Michele Santoro’s words
As previously mentioned, the advent of technology has changed in a very profound way the way in which individuals, stakeholders and political actors conceive the decision-making process and, in general, the management of the various political processes involved both in election periods and in carrying out daily tasks. The digitalisation process has affected every branch of politics and, recently, the institutions have acquired an important awareness of it. Not by chance, the European Union not long ago passed the first laws relating to the management of privacy and to the most innovative technologies such as machine learning and artificial intelligence.
In addition to this, what Santoro said has shifted the attention of the public and the political actors involved towards a solution that is much more rooted in everyday life and, in general, in common use, namely the digital signature. Since it is a method of formalization and certification of an official document as a paper signaturethe digital alternative would represent a way for Santoro to optimize and make more accessible The democratic process.
“Read written and left in the drawer”this has been discussed in the relevant newspapers, in relation to the use of the digital signature for the 2024 European elections. The collection of the number of signatures necessary for entry into the various constituencies has always represented a large bureaucratic deficit in the of this type of electoral process. Therefore, the use of a digital signature is a fast and secure solution to broaden the target participation of potential voters. To date, the digital signature continues to not constitute a useful solution in the context of political decisions and electoral campaigns. Nonetheless, the question raised by Michele Santoro could, finally, shed light on the usefulness of this means to promote democracy.
SPECIAL
