What is also annoying is the lack of clear analysis on the part of those who do sports communication in the Lazio world.
In recent years we have tried to pass on the narrative of the “Cinderella” who won more than anyone after Juventus.
In reality it is quite clear where football is heading in terms of ownership, and how the proposed model is no longer adequate at the very moment in which Atalanta inevitably has to turn to investors of that type.
I believe the same will soon happen with De Laurentiis’s Napoli, an ownership that however over these years has invested much more than Lotito and has been able to do a fairly good job in terms of sporting results culminating in a well-deserved championship.
Thinking that with Cragnotti we were at least 10/15 years ahead of our time, and now we risk being 20 years behind, has a certain effect.
This refusal to take note of the changing times in the face of the concrete and real possibilities of the current ownership seems quite irrational and harmful to me.
And I’m not just referring to the economic ones, because it’s true that good ideas can also count in football, but then these are generally the result of those who have the skills, the ability and the strength to put them into action, that is, also of who knows how to surround themselves with such people and put them in key roles with the necessary responsibilities.
In conclusion, I wonder what the sense of the current ownership is in wanting to continue in these terms, where it obtains rather fluctuating sporting results and not in line with the expectations of a relatively important place (albeit with a troubled history), every time when she gets there she is then forced to backtrack in order to avoid taking on risks that are clearly beyond her reach; the economic results are not that sensational, in terms of visibility it is starting to look quite bad not only to those inside the football world but also outside.
