The municipal administration, confirming what was previously anticipated, intends to continue with the project concerning the transfer of the operators of the covered market in Viale Dante from the fifth pavilion to the previous two, currently partially occupied respectively by workers in the fruit and vegetable and various general sectors.
This was reiterated this morning, Friday 21 June, in the Commission by the Councilor for Commerce Marina Chiarelli, recalling how the work to amend the draft regulation envisages on the one hand the creation of a consortium for the management of the structure and on the other a redistribution of product sectors. To allow, as you specified, “greater usability for users and advantages for operators”.
The basic idea would be to “merge” all the market stalls (for Chiarelli “a little… scattered today”) in the first four pavilions, consequently freeing up the last one, on which the deputy mayor said that “there would be some ideas for its future use with respect to its current sales activity, such as the creation of a social gathering and aggregation point, with a multipurpose room intended to host exhibitions and events”.
The most significant problem arises from the possibility of moving the operators who own fixed structures (currently four, while twelve are those with “assemble and dismantle” structures). Faced with the request “to make a further economic sacrifice in a period like the one we are going through, once the cost estimates have been collected, our intention is to grant a contribution as a form of further incentive”, taking into consideration that the The operation «was requested by the administration and agreed upon and welcomed by all».
Sara Paladini (Pd) knows the greatest doubts: «While recognizing this phased procedure, it is also necessary to define a timescale. And then are we sure that under the other spans there is room for everyone? If all the available area in the other pavilions is also occupied by the “assembly and disassembly” there will be no possibility of a space for the planned administration”. «It is an impassable path at the moment», Chiarelli replied, but the “dem” exponent insisted: «We will make our proposals on the state today. I would then like to protect the Municipality by avoiding the creation of a dangerous precedent. With what legal criterion did you decide to grant a contribution in response to the request for travel? At this point everyone could ask it every time.” “This is something different than what happened in other situations, from Piazza Pasteur to the Moi,” replied the councilor.
