The support office of the MIT (Ministry of Infrastructure), with the recent opinion n. 2577/2024 intervenes on a very current topic, providing, at the same time, shareable feedback. The question posed is, by now, a fairly well-known one, i.e. whether the assignment/awarding procedures envisaged in the sub-threshold can be “worsened” (as noted in the question) – specifically on the basis of specific thresholds – and whether the deadlines (within which to complete the procedure) are those in Annex I.3 (in relation to specific cases).
The question is posed in relation to direct assignment and the possibility, instead of using the administrative procedure in question, of using the negotiated procedure. In detail the question states: “In the amount range foreseen for direct assignments referred to in art. 50, paragraph 1, letter. a) and b), it is possible to aggravate the procedure by instead carrying out a negotiation foreseen by letters. c), d) and e) of the same article? If possible, the “terms of the procurement procedures”, instead of the “zero” envisaged for direct awarding, must instead be considered as those provided for in Annex I.3, art. 1, letter. d) and art. 2, letter. d)?”
KEEP READING….
){kind=link}