from the house (where the broken signs are) to the river property to the rescue, who is involved

Exchange of accusations for the Natisone massacre. Yes…

Already a subscriber? Log in here!

  • Everyone the articles of the site, also from the app
  • Insights and newsletters exclusive
  • THE podcasts of our signatures

– or –

Subscribe to the subscription by paying with Google

Subscribe

SPECIAL OFFER

SPECIAL OFFER

MONTHLY

€6.99

€1 PER MONTH
For 6 months

CHOOSE NOW

Then only €49.99 instead of €79.99/year

Subscribe with Google

Exchange of accusations for the Natisone massacre. Should access to the beach have been prohibited? Were all the signs there? One of them, for example, was broken. But the access point to the river does not lie in the municipality of Premariacco (the stretch where the tragedy occurred) but on private property. And even the watercourse itself does not belong to the center in the province of Udine, but rather belongs to the Region. Then there is the prosecutor’s investigation into the rescue efforts, however check whether the closest ones have been called and ascertain other (possible) anomalies. Let’s see who might be involved.

Natisone, the reconstruction of the dynamics: the difference in altitude, the canyon, the escape route and the fear of water. So they ended up trapped

 
For Latest Updates Follow us on Google News
 

PREV Former Aermacchi area: stalemate after the meeting between the municipal administration and Orrigoni. In the meantime the construction site closes
NEXT Ballots, the center-left wins in the regional capitals