No clues and no witnesses for Juan Jesus: the reasons behind Acerbi’s “justified acquittal”.

No clues and no witnesses for Juan Jesus: the reasons behind Acerbi’s “justified acquittal”.
Descriptive text here

The absolution of Francesco Acerbi after the alleged racist insult towards Juan Jesus continues to be discussed. But why did the Sports Judge make this decision? La Gazzetta dello Sport will explain it in detail, starting from the hearings with the FIGC Prosecutor’s Office in which the two protagonists of the affair reiterated their versions: the Inter fan showed up with the CEO. Beppe Marotta and the club’s lawyer Angelo Capelliniwhile the Brazilian wanted to complete this journey alone, relying only on his agent Roberto Calenda and without considering the assistance of a lawyer from Naples necessary.

What determined Acerbi’s acquittal, the rosy reiterates, was the lack of clues, rather than evidence. “It is clear that if an audio or video capable of ascertaining the Nerazzurri’s racist insult had been found, we would have immediately proceeded with the «at least ten days of disqualification» provided for in article 28 of the Code of Sports Justice on “conduct discriminatory” – we read -. It is also true that in the past there have been cases – the one that is talked about most often these days is the disqualification of Santini of Padua for racist insults to Mawuli of Sambenedettese – in which the discriminatory gesture was punished with ten shifts of suspension even in the absence of certain evidence, but there was at least one clue, such as the testimony of a companion“. Factors that are completely missing in the Acerbi case. This is why, legally speaking, the acquittal of the Inter center back is justified, concludes Gazza.

BUY OFFICIAL INTER PRODUCTS HERE!

 
For Latest Updates Follow us on Google News
 

PREV Here are all the bonuses of the day available starting today in Animal Crossing: Pocket Camp (week of 04/25)!
NEXT When does the ATP Monte Carlo 2024 start? Dates, program, times, TV. The format is the ‘ancient’ one