The transfer market is perhaps the theme in which the Italian obsession with Juventus finds its most entertaining declinations. If once upon a time we had to rely on some ideas from conspiracy-minded friends or at most a local radio station, today we have the magnificent stage of social media where fans with a certain following, with or without a journalist’s card, decide to delight us every day.
We know the brilliant underlying thesis on which the country is based: the Bianconeri are deceiving. Whether it’s a referee – even in the year with 0 interventions in 38 matches by the VAR in favor of the “strikes” of Berardi And Malinovskyi however, there is a penalty for Bologna that causes scandal – or a transfer operation, it makes little difference.
And it would be funny, as we did until a few years ago, if these conspiracy theories hadn’t moved from bars to the courts. For this reason, even if we struggle to take them seriously, it is good to stop and report the last pearls: perhaps one day we will find them among the prosecution files of some trial (by the way, any news on other people’s capital gains? Ah, the haste, the timeliness: how many memories…)
The transfer market, Locatelli and Scamacca
After the years of the alleged gifts from Sassuolo (the last kind gift that outraged the country: Locatels to 38 million, due to the deferred payment), last summer some fans and journalists had hypothesized that behind the preference of Scamacca for Atalanta compared to the offer ofInter would necessarily require the intervention of another unspecified club (it’s up to you to guess which one). Intriguing but all in all laughable accusation: it was in any case the summer after the summary trial and exclusion from Europe, practically without purchases, the material was objectively little.
With their return to the Champions League, Juve returns to the transfer market and the usual suspects don’t like it: wasn’t it enough to keep them out of the cups for a year due to the always useful “sporting disloyalty”? Are they already moving again as if nothing had happened?
The procedure is standard, well known by now: months of saying that the Bianconeri do not have a single euro and will only be able to buy some heroic volunteers willing to play for free. Then, when it comes down to it, here are the suspicions: how do they negotiate? Koopmeiners?
Oh no, the numbers don’t add up: why should Bologna sell Calafiori just 25 million?
Here are the legendary capital gains, the exchanges, those that Juve should register in one penalizing way and the rivals in another because the Turin club is listed on the stock exchange and the others are not. Free maxi imaginative capital gains for everyone, but not if you are listed: not bad, this concept of “sporting disloyalty”. Young people’s evaluations: “how do they evaluate Iling more McKennie 35 million one year from the deadline? What’s underneath?”
