COUNCILOR BOSI, THE EGG AND THE HEN » Ennio Tardini Stadium Parma

(Gmajo) – Up Parma Today this morning, Tuesday 18 June 2024, we find statements from councilor Marco Bosi, political leader of hot potato New Tardini. Statements that lead the online newspaper to be the owner: Bosi: “The Stadium? We are confident but the temporary conditions influence the choices on the Tardini.”

Between the municipal administration and the private investor (better: its managers), as the MDC Luca Martines “the conversation is always extremely positive”, since they have “built a climate of great collaboration”, so the “interlocutions” I am “continuous and constant”. In fact, the two are dating deus ex machina they even mutually borrowed the language (it’s not trivial) or, as in today’s case, the justifications (and the way of expressing them)…

The quoted sentences of the corporate managing director of the Parma Calcio they had been uttered by him on the sidelines of the awards ceremony in the Region of the Crociato association newly promoted to Serie A: in that context, in my opinion climbing on mirrorsas I had already had the opportunity to comment on, had compared the difficulties of erecting the temporary stadium to those of pull up the definitive… And today Bosihe comes out claiming: “Parma also has important issues to resolve, such as the issue of the temporary stadium which, certainly, is at the center of their thoughts today and which inevitably also influences the choices on the Tardini”.

If regarding the paradox ofchicken and egg there may even be philosophical doubts about who was born before or after, as far as the stadiums, it is clear that the provisional be the son of definitive, so he leaves a lot of time to argue, as Bosi does, that the temporaryfor society, is the most important issue to resolveAnd at the center of their thoughts. If this were the case, however, it would also be quite serious, because it goes without saying that it is absolutely impossible to proceed with a project relating to the temporary structure if we do not first have the desired yes for the definitive one in hand. Who, in fact, is that idiot who would put his hands into his wallet by adding (at least) ten million euros for a temporary system, without first having the certainty of being able to complete the permanent one.

In short, logically, ah, that cal strusa.

Then, I know well that to conclude the provisional it will take about twelve months – perhaps slightly less if he were baptized Sorbolo, where the authorization process (read Services Conference) may be slightly shorter than elsewhere, especially the Tardiniwhere, as he honestly admits Martines, “the project is extremely complex, because it is a stadium in the city center which has a series of impacts and limitations due to its location” – why if it were to be usable for the 2025-26 season there wouldn’t be much time to waste. But, as I argued before, without a yes for the definitive one cannot think of the provisional…

Furthermore, if the temporary he is thus at the center of Parma’s thoughts, as he argues Bosiyou might know – now that the elections are over with the re-election of all the previous candidates participating in the contest (Cesari for Sorbolo, Fecci for Noceto, Friggeri for Montechiarugolo / Monticelli Terme), apart from Davide Malvisi’s dolphin who replaced Andrea Massari – in which direction are we heading, with whom are the discussions taking place, after the electoral silence?

But let’s get back to Bosi: I don’t know if it’s because of the transcriber (they look like those of Gialappa’s For Trapattoni), but his statements a Parma Today they seem pretty good to meMy friendsthat is, essentially, with respect speaking, of super cocks: “Why hasn’t the Services Conference expressed its opinion yet? There are many opinions and they are technical, but it is the combination of things that then generates the possibility of going to a decision. Therefore it is necessary that all the steps are also taken by the company, in particular I believe that the issue of the temporary stadium legitimately conditions them on construction times, because the conference expresses very precise technical opinions which require very precise technical information” . Which fits the bill temporary if the Services Conference (which in other contexts had been considered closed, causing the mainstream, while now it is admitted that it is open!) concerns the stadium definitive? For the provisional one, if anything, another one will be convened later, if it is not yet known – at least, publicly, then in the secret rooms who knows… – which municipality has been chosen?

Let’s get on with it Bosi-thought from Parma Today: “There is trust, but it is not an issue linked to the times because it does not depend only on us. There is confidence that we will move forward in the times we have set ourselves, because the objective will be to arrive at a construction site as soon as possible, that is, at the end of next season. This was now the goal. Parma had long ago declared that they wanted to play their first season in the top flight at the Tardini. We continue to work with serenity and frankness in relations between the parties with a common objective.” Honestly, it’s not very easy to line up what it means: however, about the times we talked about, I would like to know which ones you are referring to, since from the beginning of the stadium process to today they have changed several times, such as the famous month of May which should have been that of the two council meetings on the urban planning variant and duration of the concession . In any case, if the objective, as he claims, is that the 2025-26 season is not played in the old Tardini, today we are already extremely late (and the ideas on what to do do not appear clear at all), imagining ourselves after the seaside period… Gabriele Majo

RELATED ARTICLES AND MULTIMEDIA CONTRIBUTIONS

Related posts