Chaos at the end of the championship: Alessandria, Brindisi and SPAL referred to the National Federal Court

Chaos at the end of the championship: Alessandria, Brindisi and SPAL referred to the National Federal Court
Chaos at the end of the championship: Alessandria, Brindisi and SPAL referred to the National Federal Court

The federal prosecutorfollowing a report from Co.Vi.So.C.has referred three Serie C clubs to the National Federal Tribunal – Disciplinary Section. But what led to this situation and what are the specific accusations?

CHAPTER ALEXANDRIA

The Piedmontese club is accused of violating the art. 6, paragraph 1, of the Sports Justice Code (CGS) and art. 33, paragraph 4, of the CGS, in relation to art. 85, letter. c), par. v) of the Internal Organizational Rules of the FIGC (NOIF). But it doesn’t end here: there are other accusations related to the art. 33, paragraph 3, and art. 31, paragraph 1, of the CGS, always in relation to art. 85 of the NOIF. Andrea Molinaropresident of the Board of Directors and CEO ofAlexandria, was referred for violation of articles. 4, paragraph 1, and 33, paragraph 4, of the CGS “for having violated the duties of loyalty, probity and correctness, for having failed, by the deadline of 18 March 2024, to pay the IRPEF installments relating to the installment plan in to be.”

TOAST CHAPTER

Also the Toasts he had his cold shower. The Apulian club was reported for violation of the art. 6, paragraph 1, of the CGS and art. 33, paragraph 3, of the CGS, in relation to art. 85, letter. c), par. iv) of the NOIFs. Mariachiara Rispolisole administrator of Toastswas referred for “not having made, by the deadline of 18 March 2024, the payment to members of the net emoluments relating to the months of January and February 2024.”

SPAL CHAPTER

Also there SPAL, a historic Italian football club, remained entangled in this ruling. The Ferrara team was reported for violation of the art. 6, paragraph 1, of the CGS and art. 33, paragraph 4, of the CGS, in relation to art. 85, letter. c), par. v) of the NOIFs. Joseph Tacopinapresident of the Board of Directors and legal representative of SPAL, was referred for “failing to pay the IRPEF withholdings for the months of January and February 2024 by the deadline of 18 March 2024.” A giant with feet of clay, one might say.

CO.VI.SO.C. AND THE CONSEQUENCES

The Supervisory Commission on Professional Football Clubs placed a magnifying glass on these three clubs (Co.Vi.So.C.) who played a crucial role in this affair. It was his report that triggered the referral. There Co.Vi.So.C. acts by constantly monitoring the financial situation of the clubs and intervening when necessary. But what will be the consequences of these accusations? The referral to National Federal Tribunal could lead to severe sanctionsranging from the penalty in the ranking to the relegation.

 
For Latest Updates Follow us on Google News
 

PREV OFFICIAL-Nissa: a young midfielder reconfirmed
NEXT AMP-Borsa today live | Ftse Mib closes on parity. On the podium Pirelli, Leonardo and Recordati. Sales on Tim