In the interview with Laurent Vierin, we explored his recent renunciation of candidacy in the European elections with the “Federalism and Autonomy” movement. Vierin explained that the lack of full agreement on the project contents of the proposal determined this decision, underlining the importance of consistency with one’s ideals. He also highlighted the insensitivity of the Aosta Valley autonomist movements towards collaboration and sharing common projects. Furthermore, he shared his future plans to promote the autonomy of the Aosta Valley and defend linguistic and cultural minorities. Finally, he thanked those who supported his candidacy, recognizing the importance of their support in strengthening his political commitment.
Good morning Laurent Vierin, thank you for accepting this interview. First of all, I would like to ask you to elaborate on your recent renunciation of candidacy in the European elections with the “Federalism and Autonomy” movement. What were the main reasons that pushed you to make this decision?
“Good morning, thank you for the opportunity to talk about these topics. Our withdrawal was determined by the lack of full agreement on the design contents of our proposal. We felt it was important to maintain consistency with our ideals and principles, rather than proceeding at all costs towards an objective that does not fully reflect our beliefs. In politics, as in life, I believe it is essential to act with determination and coherence, avoiding falling into contradictions or hypocrisies”.
You mentioned the lack of support from the Aosta Valley autonomist movements. Can you elaborate on this point and explain why you believe this has highlighted an insensitivity on the part of such movements?“
“Of course. It was clear that the majority of the autonomist movements of the so-called “Réunion” did not support our candidacy. This highlighted a certain tendency to favor maintaining their own positions rather than working on common projects based on ideals and values shared. It is an attitude that, unfortunately, can be interpreted as a sign of insensitivity towards the importance of building a common future based on collaboration and sharing, rather than on personal interest”.
What future projects do you intend to pursue, despite renouncing the European elections, to promote the autonomy of the Aosta Valley and defend linguistic and cultural minorities?
“Our “Federalism & Autonomy” project will continue to be a point of reference for promoting the autonomy of the Aosta Valley and defending linguistic and cultural minorities. We want to work to build a future in which cultural and territorial differences are valued and protected, both in our region and beyond our borders. We will continue to defend linguistic minorities, the cultural peculiarities of our communities and the specific challenges that the mountains and Alpine identity face and is part of a long-term commitment to building a community based on principles of solidarity, inclusion and mutual respect.”
Finally, what are your hopes and expectations for the future of Aosta Valley politics, and how do you think your commitment can contribute to this process of change?
“My hopes for the future of Aosta Valley politics are linked to an awakening from endrumià, that is, from the sort of torpor or immobility that seems to have recently characterized the political panorama of the region. I hope that we can return to talking about significant themes and projects, looking to the future with a shared vision and commitment. My commitment fits into this context, trying to promote a policy based on principles and values that can guide our community we can contribute to building a better future for the Aosta Valley, in which autonomy is valued and cultural diversity is appreciated and respected”.
You thanked those who supported this candidacy, including “Pays d’Aoste Souverain” and “Orgeuil Valdôtain”. Can you tell us more about how their support has influenced your political commitment and your vision for the Aosta Valley?
“Absolutely. The support received from “Pays d’Aoste Souverain”, “Orgeuil Valdôtain” and from all the other people who believed in and supported this candidacy was fundamental. It represented a confirmation of the trust placed in me and in the work we were doing It was encouraging to see how much interest and support there was for our policy proposal, and this strengthened my determination to pursue our goals our commitment to defending the autonomy of the Aosta Valley and its cultural and linguistic specificities”.
So the project remains relevant?
“Absolutely also because it is a project which, recalling Emile Chanoux and referring to the Chivasso declaration and the Ventotene Manifesto, truly defends and protects linguistic minorities, cultural and territorial differences, even of small realities, with particular reference to mountain issues and of the Alpine identity”.
A hope?
“That the project can continue beyond the European elections, convinced that in the Aosta Valley political landscape, first and foremost, we need an awakening from the endrumia that we are experiencing, to return to talking about themes and projects, actions that look to the future and not just to everyday life, with a vision and a political project, returning to principles and values that can be a guide for our community. Because, as Nelson Mandela said, ‘A winner is a dreamer who has never given up’ – Ad Maiora, semper!”.
Merci
pi.mi.
