Board of Directors of the ASP, the opposition wants clarity on the names of the group

Board of Directors of the ASP, the opposition wants clarity on the names of the group
Board of Directors of the ASP, the opposition wants clarity on the names of the group

The affair of the ASP that manages the retirement home is taking on the contours of the classic “Pandora’s box”, from which “gleanings” and disagreements emerge at a political level. After the resignation of the old Board of Directors, it seems that the new council majority wants to appoint a trio composed of Stefano Fede, Marco Attili and Alessandra Aramini to represent the lists that support the mayor Mauro Sclavi. These are rumors that chase each other and perhaps tomorrow – the day on which the ASP assembly was convened – we will know more. Meanwhile, the centre-right opposition group asks “publicly if the names that have been circulating for some time will be confirmed” and then attacks the mayor by recalling that it was he who, on 2 May 2023, as president of the shareholders’ meeting, asked for his resignation of the old Board of Directors, “motivating the request – we read in the centre-right note – with the little sympathy that the current municipal administration had towards the members, given that they were not an expression of the current majority”. At this point, the opposition municipal councilors point out, “we don’t know if the mayor intends to clear his conscience with a discussion table with all the political forces, after having humiliated them only a year ago”.

Then the center-right stigmatizes what happened in the City Council (when councilor D’Este withdrew his question “with the embarrassing silence of the Prime Minister, Alessandro Massi”) and highlights how the intervention of “Civico22” confirmed, on the one hand , “which continue the effects of that famous 2022 pre-ballot handshake”, and on the other “the continuous errors of a mayor who, between slips and lapses in style, ridicules us throughout the province and beyond”. Finally, the note states, “but wasn’t Civico22 the one who said that it didn’t want anything from the municipal administration and that it didn’t want to name any kind of name? So, what can we talk about with a majority that, through the voice of its mayor, doesn’t does he intend to speak with those who were nominated by those who preceded him? More than asking for a table, then, perhaps it is better to invest time in listening to the problems of the city, rather than putting up flags”.

mg

 
For Latest Updates Follow us on Google News
 

PREV The son of the FdI deputy to the carabinieri: “I’ll have you fired, you don’t know who I am…”. Then the pushes and kicks to the soldiers
NEXT Terni, five arrests by the Carabinieri due to judge’s orders