New episode on Rai Tre For Who has seen? which, in addition to excellent services and appeals to help families find missing people and insights into unsolved cases, sees a truly unexpected moment in which the presenter is the protagonist Federica Sciarelli. Let’s find out what it is happened in the episode of Wednesday 26 June.
Who has seen? What happened on Wednesday 26 June
The central part of the broadcast is dedicated to the latest news on the brutal man murder of Pierina Paganelli. Also guests in the studio are the geneticist Marina Baldi and Roberta Bruzzone who participated in the interrogation of Louis Dassilva, currently the only one under investigation for Pierina’s murder. In particular, this evening Federica Sciarelli focuses on him, but even more on her relationship with his wife Valeriadefined by Roberta Bruzzone, “a tough person”, and of hers with hers Pierina’s lover and daughter-in-law, Manuela. The presenter sends back an excerpt of the interview with Luis who reiterates “I didn’t go down” to the garage on the night of the murder. Then we move on to investigate the relationship between wife and lover who, before that tragedy, were very close friends. She lets herself listen to a message from Valeria to Manuela before her murder, in which she consoles her because she suffers from the attitude of Manuela’s mother-in-law, Pierina. But then, between the two women, everything changes when Valeria discovers Manuela and Louis’ relationship and wants clarification from her ex-friend: “Find 10 minutes to talk to me, like you used to find to go fuck with my husband “he says in a message. And again: “I wanted decency to remain a private thing… Did you fall in love with my husband? So why were you being her friend?”
Bruzzone claims that Louis and Manuela continued to see each other even after the murder. The presenter underlines that in this story, after the discovery of Pierina’s violent death, there is a first moment in which the four people closest to the woman and most “attentive” right away, Manuela and Loris, and Louis and Valeria, had named all the same legal advisor, Barzan. “Louis is the first to talk about this relationship” underlines Bruzzone and adds that in the meeting she had with Manuela after the murder, Barzan asked Louis to take the blame. Four people linked by kinship, by the palace and by the consultant, after this meeting decide to each go their own way and Valeria decides to support her husband, despite everything.
From the murder of Pierina Paganelli to the disappearance of Mara Favro: the stories investigated during the episode
And at this point comes the twist of the evening, a bolt from the blue. In fact, to tell about this woman, the editorial team of Who has seen it? he also follows her social networks and Federica Sciarelli sends out a very particular post: “We saw this postthis one from the Tro**ona”, he says, even making Bruzzone laugh“This car, with this plaque is incredible!”. In the post you can see the back of a car with the license plate TR010NA, and Valeria adds the words: “I thought I saw this car in the garage… do they make personalized license plates?” They are all posts obviously aimed at her husband’s ex-friend and lover, Manuela. Sciarelli shows another one that reads: “You know the story ‘if you behave well it will come back to you? But back where exactly?…” And comments: “Well, Valeria doesn’t lose her sense of humor, eh”. Roberta Bruzzone says: “She’s extraordinary in this, she also has a truly surprising ability to make fun of herself”. As for her sense of humor, however, they must not be doing badly in the studio and in the editorial office either.
Obviously, these few minutes send the Chilavvisters into raptures from every corner of Italy, admired and amused by the moment of lightness inserted into an episode he told really heavy stories.
Like that of Nicolas, the young truck driver, father of a child who worked as a lorry driver. Traces of him had been lost while he was carrying a load of luxury bags. Unfortunately, this week her lifeless body was found in a ravine. “This is a story that shows us that humanity is finished, buried.” Federica Sciarelli introduces her with these harsh words, launching the service with the news that she has taken away all hope from the young worker’s family. “They stopped him saying they needed help, what does this story teach us? That we no longer even have to stop in front of those who ask us for help?”.
We then return to talking about passing of Mara Favro (“nothing but voluntary removal!” introduces the presenter). The correspondent of Who saw it? has collected new testimonies, starting from that of another woman who worked in the pizzeria of the disappearance, because it focuses on the fact that many had left that job and also Mara, in a message to her new friend, says that he intends to leave the pizzeria. The pizza chef, a former waitress, a cook and a woman who reported the owner, speak of unpaid money owed, endless hours. The woman who reported speaks of exploitation, the pizza chef describes this owner as an aggressive person, he, Luca, the owner says that this pizza chef, Cosimo, tells lies. And this Cosimo has a car with which he would have given Mara a lift that evening, but the pizza chef denies it, saying that he doesn’t have a license. But anyway then Mara went back to the restaurant from which she then disappeared. She also goes back to talking about the alleged selfie of her in the dark which she sent to her daughter on WhatsApp, “It’s disturbing, she would never have sent something like that to her daughter”, says her ex-husband Massimiliano who deleted that truly scary photo precisely because it is terrifying. Mara’s ex also finds it strange that, after the message in which the woman says she wants to leave the pizzeria, she then turns off her phone while she was talking to her friend. In short, there are many dark points in this story.
Another very sad story is that of Giusy Ventimigliadisappearance 8 years ago from Bagheria, in whose case the only suspect was the father and now the investigation has been closed. But the girl’s brother, Salvo, asks to continue, and what emerges is that the girl had ended up in a prostitution ring or in any case, “Giusy had contacts with criminals and previous convictions for crimes relating to the exploitation of prostitution”. An aspect of the story which, however, the Ventimiglia family’s lawyer points out, was not investigated. Many men met the girl and three of her contacted her several times on the day of her appearance. But only her father was investigated: “And all the other characters who were buzzing around her? I would say that they needed to be investigated”, says her brother. These men told the investigators that they “helped” the girl by giving her a few euros or a few cigarettes or something to eat. They say: “Giusy was pitiful, she was crazy, she was a little crazy but she was a good girl”. The brother draws conclusions: “They took advantage of it of her”. In the documents it is said that he had relationships of “dubious morality”, and Salvo bitterly comments: “Dubious morality? And why do the husbands, the fathers of the family, the grandparents who went with her, have morality? No judgment on these people? We family members are the monsters and Giusy is a person of dubious morality. These are the conclusions.” And yes, perhaps Sciarelli is right, “humanity is finished, buried”.
