“Whatever happens, climate change is always to blame” begins Giovanni Frajese to the microphones of A special day. Indeed, it seems that modern society has found a scapegoat to blame whenever there is a need. Temperatures are not the same as ten years ago and the climate is constantly changing. But are we really on the brink of irreversible global warming, or is that what they want us to believe? Meanwhile, the objectives ofAgenda 2030 are far from their actual implementation. One of the main ones was that of reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 40% compared to 1990 levels. “Science is no longer a method of investigation. I would like to humbly remind you why Assange he’s in prison and everything he revealed with his emails about global warming.”
The investigation by Milena Gabanelli and Andrea Priante
But what is behind climate change? The journalist Milena Gabanelli answers this fateful question, on Corriere della Sera. “In his address book” reminds us Fabio Duranti “tells us that the green policies of Europe hide large conflicts of interest of theirs consulting company. He tells us that companies must have their environmental impact certified but certifiers are also in the itself task force which defines the criteria.
So now do you understand why the green has to go forward? Because there are companies that have already defined all the criteria and they have to make money from it. To make money there is fear: it’s a bit like the Covid story. There is no way out and critical thinking is silenced for this reason.”
In Europe the Commission indicates strategies and objectives of green policies, but to do so it is necessary to study the specifics of each production sector. “Europe’s green policies and the major conflicts of interest of consultancy firms” is the name of the investigation of Milena Gabanelli And Andrea Priante. To adopt a more consumption model sustainablepursuing green lines, the Commission addresses the Consultants external markets. What emerges from the investigation is that consultants work both for Public Institutions who write the rules, and for private companies who must respect them.
There European Court of Auditors examined the contracts between the Commission and these consultancy firms, noting that there are no effective controls to avoid conflicts of interest. “This means that many companies are stuck in both directions” he claims Priante. “For example the Ramboll Management was paid to carry out a study on how to make buildings resistant to climate change. At the same time, however, it offers itself to Private companies who must build sustainable buildings capable of withstanding extreme climate events. Furthermore, the Task Force of experts was made up of representatives of the largest consultancy companies in the world: ERNST & YOUNG, Deloitte, KPMG and PWC“.
These same companies are hired by other private clients. The result is that it is always the same companies that see the tenders renewed and this creates a depletion of skills within the companies Public Institutions. The salary of a manager of a consultancy company is 4 times higher than that of someone who works in public administration. This does nothing but impoverish them public resources and it creates a vicious circle that always favors the same companies.
