Is James Gunn’s Superman all a conspiracy against Henry Cavill? Some fans on the web are strangely convinced of this, and if you want to have a laugh we’ll explain why.
As you may already know, the birth of the new DC Studios’ DCU meant the final dismissal of Henry Cavill from the role of Supermansomething that few were happy about especially after, at the end of a back and forth that lasted several years, just a few weeks before the announcement of the new franchise by James Gunn and Peter Safran the actor of Man of Steel and Justice League he had surprisingly reprized the role of Clark Kent in the famous post-credit scene of Black Adam.
The timing wasn’t the best, we’re willing to admit this, but some fans of the actor (as well as haters of James Gunn) are even convinced that it was a a grand conspiracy to harm Henry Cavill. And if you think that it is a minority you are very wrong, because this ‘movement’ has made so much noise that it has even bothered none other than James Gunn, who commented on the matter on his Threads page: “I don’t understand how anyone could argue something like that – other than the fact that I had never thought about running DC until Peter Safran decided to do it with me so he could take care of the management side of things and leave me to run the management side. creative, but when I was hired by DC to write the new Superman film my project was born as a reboot regardless, with a new story and a new Clark Kent. What’s the point of this particular conspiracy theory?“
For other content on the DCU saga, we would like to point out that important news on the Lanterns TV series may be on the way.
On DUNE: PART TWO STEELBOOK 3 (4K Ultra HD Blu-ray) It is one of today’s best sellers.
