– Advertising –
Reading time: 4 minutes
Paleari’s perfect performance began after three minutes by repelling a poisonous diagonal from Diakitè. Applause match also for Simonetti and the entire back department. There were few playable balls for the attack, too static to cope with the great pace imposed on the match by Torres. He holds the midfield with Nardi and Talia.
PALEARI vote 8 – If Benevento is still in the running for a place in Serie B, the credit goes to them: the eveningman of the party‘ begins with a difficult intervention on a diagonal from Diakité. Then he doesn’t do anything wrong, sealing the 0-0 with another couple of prodigious clearances and unraveling many difficult situations. Phenomenon.
BERRA vote 7 – The usual courageous race where he gave everything he had. In the first half, Torres’ attackers came out from everywhere, but she managed to keep the boat afloat by splitting herself up. Precious.
HAIR vote 7 – He repeated the same standard as the first leg, resulting in one of the best on the pitch. It is now a certainty despite his young age. He sacrifices himself a couple of times at the end when in the area there is only a lot to do with shots.
VISCARDI vote 6.5 – As in the “Ciro Vigorito” match, it takes him a while to get the measure of his opponents who don’t give him real points of reference. He grows at a distance when Torres’ phrasing becomes less fluid and he can catch his breath.
IMPROTA vote 5.5 – His is a game of sacrifice alone, but there are too many errors in the support phase or in managing the ball. He suffers terribly in his area from the constant exchanges of his opponents which often send him overrevving (from the 36’st MECCARIELLO sv).
TALIA vote 6.5 – He runs and fights like a mastiff until Auteri keeps him on the field. Precious when the ball needs to be frozen to allow the team to ease Torres’ pressure (from 37′ st Agazzi sv).
NARDI vote 6 – Just like Ciro Vigorito in the first leg, he was in trouble due to Torres’ pressing who didn’t give him an inch to think. Having been warned (he was on a warning), he will miss the first leg semi-final against Carrarese.
SIMONETTI vote 8 – Together with Paleari, he is the signature on this feat because he never pulls his leg back until the 96th minute, even with his head bandaged and his face bleeding from a cut to his eyebrow. An inexhaustible plunger in every area of the pitch where Auteri moves it.
CICIRETTI vote 5 – The tiredness for the third game in a row is there and you can feel it. He talks little with Perlingieri and perhaps it would have been better to use him during the match. He loses a poisonous ball at the start that was almost transformed into a goal by Diakité (from the 28th minute BOLSIUS vote 4: commits a colossal foolishness by entering with his leg straight at the edge of the opponent’s area, competing for a ball that is neither dangerous nor decisive. Sacrosanct direct red which reopens a match that was already on ice).
PERLINGIERI vote 5.5 – He plays with Torres’ defenders denoting great personality, but his game is all here because he never manages to gain ground or make an important play (from the 29th minute Starita vote 5: he enters and seems to want to break the world, but he always goes around in circles, also committing a couple of naiveties that allow Torres to get out of difficult situations. On the last ball the goal is empty but she incredibly decides not to shoot and the opportunity disappears)
LANINI vote 6 – The most positive of the three attackers despite not doing exceptional things. The spaces are narrow and the team is too short to trigger it: all things considered, he does what he can in a complicated match for the entire offensive department (from the 27th minute Ferrante vote 5.5 – Auteri throws him into the fray with the clear intention of keeping the ball and allowing the team to move up and gain meters: all things considered, this is something he never manages despite the now slower pace of the match).
AUTERI vote 6.5 – On the eve of the match he had widely taken into account a match of suffering and sacrifice, but from this perspective perhaps it would have been better to show up at the “Vanni Sanna” with a more muscular team up front and less technical than the one (the same as the first leg) chosen for the return. He is “betrayed” by the attacking players because none of the three manage to make an impact in any way. Indeed, the only one is Bolsius but sensationally in the negative with that naive red card which costs the Witch a quarter of an hour of further damned suffering. But Don Gaetano should only be given a monument for having taken a team in pieces and brought it to the playoff semi-final in six months.
