Pescara, D’Alessandro ‘regional heritage burned here’

PESCARA, JUNE 11 – “I take political responsibility for the below-expected result in Pescara, despite Gianluca Fusilli, in a very short time, managing to gain a greater consensus than the list that supported him. He couldn’t have done more, the parties who gave birth to the ‘United States of Europe’, however, had to do more. And for us a long reflection opens up which affects our raison d’être starting from the national level. History teaches us, from the crisis of the centre Italian politician La Margherita was born and established itself, the space is there, I don’t see that spirit yet”. The regional president of Italia Viva in Abruzzo, Camillo D’Alessandro, declared this in a note, commenting on Fusilli’s result, which stopped at 1.73%. “Masci wins in the first round by 0.95%, despite being over 2% below his lists. In Pescara they wanted to burn the heritage of the regional elections – continues D’Alessandro’s note – A Sanhedrin of a few, made of pats on the back, he chose the candidate for mayor, he refused the primaries, he placed and accepted vetoes, dividing what had been united only a few months earlier with D’Amico as a gigantic gift to Masci which he repeated during the election campaign a mantra a fact of truth: the center-right united for the second time, the alternative camp divided for the second time And it was Costantini himself who divided five years ago, shouting ‘never with this Pd’. never’ moved to ‘United States of Europe’ and ‘Action’, because otherwise Conte would not have given consent to the 5 Stars to be in a coalition. Spectacular: we told the people of Abruzzo not to vote for Marsilio because he is from Rome we let Conte from Puglia decide on Pescara.” “I have never seen a candidate, in the space of 24 hours, leave his party, which had even proposed him as the candidate for regional president, leave him and also put him out of the coalition. A Sanhedrin chose, Pescara decided. Truly, someone could imagine a different result? According to this strategy, we would have had to lie to the people of Pescara: hide inside the town halls and, the day after the election, put up the flag. We don’t lie and above all we don’t give up on politics can do politics.” “Last reflection on D’Amico: in the regional elections he was everything, but in the municipal and European elections he stepped aside, making himself smaller in the dynamics that divided his coalition. We need the D’Amico of the regional elections, not the one which only goes on some stages”.