Pino Insegno only found out about it by reading the news in the newspapers. He didn’t expect to find all this right there.
Pino Teach he is a beloved protagonist of Italian entertainment and a well-known face in the world of cinema and especially in that of dubbing.
It is indeed one of the most loved voice actors in Italy and over the years he has lent his voice to many actors in American cinema, such as a Viggo Mortensen, Will Farrell and Jamie Fox. However, he was also the voice of some cartoon characters, for example that of Stan Smiththe protagonist of the cartoon TV series “American Dad”.
The success of his career, however, is not limited to this. Pino Insegno is also known for being a member of the comedy quartet de “The award-winning remote company” and then to be the host of some of the most followed television quizzes in Italy, such as “The merchant at the fair” And “Chain reaction – the winning agreement“.
Pino Insegno has recently returned to being the presenter of this last programme, after a period in which the helm of the program was entrusted to Marco Liorni. However, it seems that he made everyone talk a lot. Pino Teach In fact, he didn’t expect to find news on the matter in the newspaper. Yet that’s exactly how it happened.
Pino Insegno’s new role in “Chain Reaction – the winning agreement”
Just in the last few days, Pino Insegno became the host of “Chain reaction – the winning agreement”, after a period in which the program was helmed by Marco Liorni. In fact, he presented his first episode just a few days ago, but it seems that for some reasons it has generated some dismay on the part of the presswho wrote his opinion about it.
This is confirmed by what the newspaper “The print” he wrote about it. Nobody expected to read certain things right there. Even Pino Insegno himself was one definitely taken aback.
A first episode full of inaccuracies, characterized by a forced sympathy
As reported by the “La Stampa” website, the first episode of “Chain reaction – winning agreement”, hosted by Pino Insegno, was full of inaccuracies and marked by a not exactly peaceful atmospherecharacterized by the forced sympathy of the host.
This is what “La Stampa” wrote about it: “For the entire duration of the game, the presenter appears imprecise and forcefully likable“.
