«Electric cars? Madness to no longer sell petrol and diesel in 2035. Green houses designed by bureaucrats”

Giorgia Meloni in Pescara: «We have fought and we intend to continue to do so, against ideological follies such as that of no longer selling diesel and petrol cars in…

Already a subscriber? Log in here!

SPECIAL OFFER

SPECIAL OFFER

MONTHLY

€4.99

€1 PER MONTH
For 3 months

ACTIVATE NOW

Then only €49.99 instead of €79.99/year

Subscribe with Google

Giorgia Meloni in Pescara: «We have fought and we intend to continue to do so, against ideological follies such as that of no longer selling diesel and petrol cars in 2035. Thus the Prime Minister in her speech at the programmatic conference of Fratelli d’Italia.

Giorgia Meloni, green and electric: her idea

“No one denies – the Prime Minister conceded – that electric is part of the solution for the decarbonisation of transport” but “I deny that it could be the only one because to argue otherwise is simply idiocy. And it becomes suicidal idiocy when it is done without taking into account that electric is produced by nations that do not even remotely respect the environmental constraints that our companies are subjected to, it is suicidal.”

On green homes, the prime minister says: “An idea conceived very badly by bureaucrats locked in glass buildings, the path taken by Europe is the wrong one.” Lto directive? «A very badly thought out directive, without taking into account any specificity as if making a wooden house in the Finnish tundra more efficient was the same thing as making a stone house in a village in Sicily more efficient”

«Only bureaucrats locked in a glass building can imagine such a thing. We managed to obtain very important results, such as the elimination of the obligation to advance an energy class to be achieved in a few years, a blow which would have cost on average between 40 and 70 thousand euros per home. For the moment we have avoided it, now each government will have two years to prepare a national plan for the reduction of polluting emissions from buildings. And it is two years – he assured – that we intend to use to try to change a regulation that still remains very, very unbalanced and which, to be reasonable, must first answer a banal question: who pays? Because it is the question that no one has answered so far and they did not answer because unfortunately the answer was: the citizens.”

© ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

Read the full article at
The Gazzettino

 
For Latest Updates Follow us on Google News
 

PREV “The lower ring of Curve B has no real engineering structure”
NEXT “We need to change our policy on archaeology”, Mulè to the candidates: “936 boxes of our goods were lost”