We thought that at least this time they were all in agreement, without “doubts”, “risks”, “strikes”, “could have been there” and the usual ambiguous terms so as not to clearly say that the penalty for Juventus was sacrosanct. But no. It has the incredible “La moviola” of the Gazzetta dello Sport, assigned to Francesco Velluzzi, born in Cagliari, from Cagliari and perhaps not exactly “serene” in his opinion. A bit like when Mediaset appointed Pistocchi for the Juventus slow-motion videos.
The Sardinian journalist manages to provide a version of events that to define as “patriotic” is an understatement: “In the 6th minute there is contact in the area between Mina and Alcaraz with the Colombian who mounts the Argentine who falls to the ground bleeding. For Piccinini there is nothing. Perhaps a revision does not seem to be worth punishing”, the journalist’s opinion.
All that was needed was to accuse Alcaraz of simulation. It is not clear what the “doubts” of the rosea’s colleague from Cagliari are. Unless you consider Alcaraz the same as the Madonna of Trevignano. The Vatican, in this case, cannot get involved. We are talking about another faith, at most the federal prosecutor’s office can intervene: and who knows, Chinè might open an investigation to verify whether the red liquid (or perhaps Gazzetta pink) that leaked from the head of the Argentine Madonna was blood or tomato juice.
Tags: ALCARAZ Madonna Trevignano blood mystery pink liquid simulation hypothesis
