FROM OUR CORRESPONDENT
LONDON – Who is the member of the British royal family who invited the actress Rebel Wilson to an orgy in California ten years ago? This is what everyone is wondering in these hours in London, after the release of the previews of the memoirs of the Australian comedian known for her starring role in The bride’s friends and other films like that.
Rebel Wilson does not name the royal, who simply calls him “the Windsor”, specifying that he was “the 15th or 20th in line to the British throne”: therefore a minor character, which leads to the immediate exclusion of already talked about figures such as Princes Harry or Andrew.
The actress talks about one medieval-themed party that took place on a ranch on the outskirts of Los Angeles, rented by a tech billionaire: Rebel is invited by Windsor, who says “we need more girls.” So she shows up in what he describes as “a buxom bridesmaid’s dress complete with conical hat.”
The party turns out to be something “crazy”, where men joust on horseback in the meadow and women dressed as mermaids swim in the pool, amidst fireworks and acrobatics. Through it all, Rebel watches the Windsor “wriggle around while I continually pull my sterns up.”
However, the true nature of the party is revealed only at 2 in the morning, when a boy appears with a tray on which there seems to be a mountain of sweets: or at least that’s what Rebel believes, because in reality it’s drugs. Faced with her confusion, they explain to her that “it’s for the orgy… it’s about to start… orgies normally start with these things around this time.”
Rebel’s eyes are opened: «Now Windsor’s comment on the need for more girls began to appear much clearer – he writes -. They weren’t talking about the number of girls and boys like it was a school disco. They were talking about an ORGY!». At that point the actress, who was in her early thirties and by her own admission still a virgin, ran away from the party.
Needless to say, the story has sparked salacious gossip in England and the hunt to identify the mysterious royal: scrolling down the line of succession to the throne, in reality there aren’t many candidates, because many are women or people who were too young for that era. He would be in 14th place Edward, Elizabeth’s last son, but he is too recognizable and then he would have been 50 years old, perhaps too old for an orgy; in 18th place there is Peter Phillips, Princess Anne’s son, who would have been 37 at the time; further down, in 25th place, we find Princess Margaret’s son, David Armstrong-Jones, who would have been 53 years old, or in 29th place Margaret’s nephew, Samuel Chatto, who however as an 18 year old would perhaps have been too young. But they are all pure suppositions and perhaps we need to go even further down, towards completely irrelevant characters.
Tags: royal invited orgy California ranch
