Europe makes Piedmont shell out 30 billion. This is the amount, in broad terms, that Piedmontese families should spend to renovate apartments and villas according to the diktat of the new directive “Green Houses” which is alarming the country. The estimate was made by Turin News together with AscomEd reprocessing the Cresme data.
FROM 30 TO 100 THOUSAND EUROS
In Turin, according to Enea data, well 44.5% of homes fall into the lowest energy classes, F and G, and will have to be adjusted. With an outlay that varies from 30 to 100 thousand euros depending on the type of house. «To carry out the energy efficiency works required by the European directive, on average approximately 10% of the value of the property would be spent. Taking for example an apartment in Crocetta worth 300 thousand euros dating back to the 1960s and 1970s, the expense would be around 30 thousand euros, but for a single house outside the city, in which only one family lives, you can easily reach 100 thousand euros» explains Marco Cossa, president of AscomEd and vice president of Ascom.
The cost estimate, item by item, for a 100 square meter apartment is shocking: one water heater new condensation costs on average 6 thousand euros and exceeds 10 thousand for one with heat pump. To redo the windows and doors it takes around 10 thousand euros to thermally insulate the roof 30 thousand and more are added coat it is worth 150 euros per square meter. Finally the expense for the solar panels, varies from 7 to 10 thousand euros depending on the type. A real drain that risks eroding the coverage of our public debt. In addition to devaluing the real estate market, a “safe haven” for Italians.
For further information, read also:
DEVALUATION ALARM
According to Codacons, the energy redevelopment interventions envisaged by the EU could determine enormous effects on the real estate market in the medium term, leading to a devaluation of up to 40% of the value of properties not subject to redevelopment works. A further blow to savers who saw the house as a safe haven in which to invest.
To compensate for the sale at a low price of a property sold without renovation, according to Confartigianato: «there should be a tax measure that allows the citizen to deduct the capital loss obtained from the sale of the property below the Irpef due to the State over ten years. of market values”. Other proposals also include “incentives for restructuring and a firm no to possible fines for those who do not adhere”. AscomEd instead proposes a more drastic solution: «Considering that our building heritage is old – explains President Cossa – and largely made up of buildings from the 1960s and 1970s which are not of particular value, it would make sense to think of increase demolitions to create new constructions”.
SUPERBONUS FLOP
The “Green Houses” directive, which received a vote against only from Italy and Hungary, coincidentally arrives in the aftermath of the 110% Superbonus which did not solve the environmental problems for which it was designed: «With the Superbonus – concludes Cossa – only 1% of what could have been achieved was achieved»
