Let’s clarify the 10 SRAM

These days a lot of talk about the New regulations introduced by UCI To protect the safety of professional runners: wider dumbbells, minimum distance between levers and also one Possible limitation of the relationships in the race (or rather, to be more precise, a limitation of metric development).

The first drafts shared by the UCI indicated as the maximum ratio 54×11. Consequently. However. Similarly, this gave birth to doubts about the possibility of the SRAM equipped teams to continue using the boxes with a 10 -tooth final pign.

In reality. Nevertheless. in an official communication issued by UCI in recent days. among other things we read the following: “The UCI will carry out a test at the end of the season to limit the Maximum Metric Development. Similarly, The goal of this measure is to limit the extreme speeds of the runners. However, which represent a risk factor for their safety. The tests. which will take place in all the stages of the Guangxi tour in China (14-19 October). will limit the maximum relationship let’s clarify 10 sram relationship All’equivalent del 54×11 (10.46 meters per ride of Pedestra). The test will be followed by a survey between the runners. will let’s clarify 10 sram new allow to study the measure in detail in view of any further tests in 2026 “.

let’s clarify 10 sram

2 key concepts emerge from this declaration.

Primo: at the moment it is just one experimentation On a few days of the tender. the definitive decision on the limitation of relationships is still far from being taken.

Second: as it was easy to imagine the UCI does not provide an indication relating to a specific combination. but to UNo Maximum metric development, corresponding to 10.46 let’s clarify 10 sram new meters.

Team equipped with Shimano groups can reach it with 54×11.
Team equipped let’s clarify 10 sram with SRAM groups. even in the event of a limitation. will be able to continue using the boxes with the 10 as a final pigno, adapt the front crowns.
The problem, in the event, lies in the fact that the 50×10 is still outside the limit (10.650 m) and that the let’s clarify 10 sram 48×10 is decidedly shorter (10.224 m) than 54×11. In short. if the limitation should become definitive, we could also imagine seeing an anterior crown on the market from 49 teeth?

The possibility of limiting metric development emerged on Safer’s recommendation. the structure dedicated to safety in cycling on women’s. male road, which brings let’s clarify 10 sram new together representatives of all interested parties in the sector, including also the runners. To talk about it, some time ago, Van Aert had also been, as you can read in the article below:

Van aert and the limitation of relationships: what if it was not such a crazy idea?

In a recent interview with Sportza. Van Aert has released some statements about group safety that have turned on a strong debate.

Read more

www.bicidastrada.it