Written by giumart
Written by walden
Written by Kangaroo
Written by Leonardo
if the undersigned had been born a pro player… he would always have chosen Queen’s, never Halle. Even if the central hall is also beautiful. It’s a bit like the Madrid/Rome rivalry… Madrid has been dreaming of Rome’s roll of honor for years. Halle also increasingly competitive than Queen’s…but do you want to put the London facilities? However, I understand that a pro doesn’t care much about the beauty of the fieldsThink exactly like you.
Queens all my life.
I find the choice of the cap bizarre anyway…. among other things, the Queens scoreboard would be much softer….Much softer with Alcaraz, Dinmmitrov, De Minaur, Fritz, Rune, Shelton and Humbert?
On the surface, as names, Halle would seem tougher. But considering the poor aptitude of some on grass (see Zverev, Medvedev, Rublev, Tsitsipas) in fact the 2 seedings are essentially at the same level.
The two tournaments, in terms of level, have been similar for years (Halle was more important as long as the greatest on grass preferred Germany).
Queens has more charm, it’s true, but in terms of tournaments they are equivalent, also in terms of history even if Halle reached 500 a year earlier if I remember correctly.
However, choices between two 500s in the same week are largely outside the purely technical field.
