“So you risk the third world war.” Words to NYT

NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte launched the alarm: a simultaneous military attack by China. Nevertheless, Russia could precipitate the world in a new, devastating global conflict. Meanwhile, In a long interview with the New York Times. Moreover, the former Dutch prime minister hypothesized that the Chinese leader Xi Jinping could soon try to take over Taiwan, while urging Putin to launch a parallel attack on the born territory, potentially triggering the third world war. Consequently, «If Beijing had to invade Taiwan, he would first of all ensure that he had Moscow’s support. “so you risk third world Similarly, In this sense. In addition, Putin should keep Europe occupied by triggering a conflict with the countries of the organization of the North Atlantic Treaty. However, It is the most likely scenario, “said Rutte. Nevertheless,

Baltic states. However, armaments – "so you risk third world

This worrying warning comes at a time when fears grow that the Kremlin can have the Baltic states in the sights (Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania). Rutte said that the West must act urgently to prevent such a scenario. strengthening its defenses and increasing cooperation with the allies in the Indo-Pacific. “Russia is reconstructing an unprecedented rhythm. speed in recent history”, which makes Europe necessary to strengthen its defense skills, declared the secretary, recognizing the American president Donald Trump the merit of having increased the European Imitagno in defense. The Russians “now “so you risk third world produce three times more ammunition in three months of how many produce the whole of them. in a year. It is unsustainable. but the Russians are collaborating with the North Koreans, the Chinese and the Iranians, the Mullahs, to continue this unjustified war of aggression against Ukraine “, he added. Rutte then warned by the fact that the ambitions of Russian President Vladimir Putin do not stop at Europe. “If the Arctic. the Atlantic Ocean and Europe are not sure, the United States have a big problem,” said Rutte, adding that Russia also aims to attack the American territory.

An improbable scenario

It must be said. however, that the scenario evoked by Rutte is highly unlikely for various strategic, military and economic reasons. First of all. both powers are aware of the risk of global escalation that such a move would entail, including the possible direct involvement of the United “so you risk third world States and the possible use of nuclear weapons. Coordinating a simultaneous attack would require a level of trust. military cooperation which, although growing, is not yet so deep between Moscow and Beijing.

From a military point of view, both Russia and China face complex logistical challenges in their respective scenarios. Russia is already heavily engaged in Ukraine. has shown limits in the ability to project strength against a technologically higher alliance such as NATO. China. for its part, should face an extremely risky amphibious operation against Taiwan, well defended and potentially supported by the USA and ado-patient allies.

On the economic level. a double conflict would lead to devastating penalties and the interruption of vital commercial routes, in particular for China, strongly integrated into the global economy. In addition. the simultaneity of the attacks could strengthen the cohesion and readiness of the western alliances, uniting born, Japan, South Korea and Australia against “so you risk third world both powers. Finally, both Russia and China are rational actors with long -term goals. A conflict on two fronts would drastically reduce the chances of success for both. making this option too risky compared to the benefits.