The rumors about the evidentiary accident: the material found 18 years after the crime of Chiara Poggi did not allow to isolate biological material. Angela Taccia, a semium lawyer: “He was not on the crime scene”
Alberto Stasi remains in semi -freedom. The Cassation rejected the appeal of the General Prosecutor at the Court of Appeal of Milan Against the order of 9 April lasting the benefit in Stasidefinitively sentenced for the death of Chiara Poggi. Meanwhile, from the first rumors about the evidentiary accident on the imprints never analyzed in the Poggi house, pending the final exams of the experts appointed by the Court of Pavia it emerges that There are no traces of DNA.
The material found at 18 years on the acetate sheets on which the footprints were kept they did not allow to isolate biological material useful for extraction of a genetic profile. Among these also the imprint 10, isolated by the Ris on the jamber of the door of the house of Garlasco, who in a five -year note the carabinieri of Milan had indicated how of particular interest “if it were generated by the blood” because it would therefore have been almost certainly attributable not to the victim but to the murderer. On that imprint, which had already reacted in recent days in a negative way to the test for the search for blood substance, It was therefore not possible to isolate any genetic material during the evidentiary accident.
«To date, not only the genetic analysis of the finds found in the garbage, but also the results that emerged from the analyzes carried out on the acetates, confirm once again that My assisted Semia does not
he found on the crime scene, As for years he himself states. ”
The words of the lawyer Angela Taccia, the lawyer of Andrea Semplio. “For
Now, even the scientific investigations carried out so far, therefore confirm the
Total extraneousness of Andrea Semplio in this terrible story. He could not
be otherwise, but we still await confident, always remaining
focus ».
However, it is not clear in the reconstruction of the new investigation opened by the prosecutor Fabio Napoleonfrom the addition Stefano was surrounded by and from prosecutors Valentina De Stefano and Giuliana Rizzawhat value has been attributed to track 10 and whether the belief of the investigators is still that it may be the imprint left by the killer. The exams of the current evidentiary accident in the seats of the Scientific Police of Milan and entrusted to the experts Denise Albani and Domenico Marches, have not yet ended e will resume on Friday 4th July on other finds Like the bathroom mat, the swabs and blood traces found at home. The works will then continue On the real decisive point of the new investigation by Paviathe comparison between the results of the DNA on the nails of the victim and that of the suspect Andrea Seveio.
As for the decision of the Cassation on the semi -freedom of Stasi (sentenced to 16 years definitive for the murder of the former partner) the judges considered the appeal of the Milan prosecutor’s office “inadmissible”. Among the points of the appeal, signed by the substitute PG Valeria Marino there was The failure to request specific authorization to give the interview to the “Le Iene” programaired on March 30, during a prize permit for a family reunification. For the General Prosecutor, in fact, the prize permits can be granted for family, cultural or work reasons And that interview is not part of any of the three fields. Thesis which, however, was rejected by the Cassation (the reasons are expected in the next few days).
For the defense, however, Stasi did not have to request any specific authorization for the interviewas specified by the Directorate of the Bollate prison and then by the Milan judges. For lawyers Giada Bocellari and Antonio De Rensis, therefore, was “violated any prescription”.
Go to all the news of Milan
Subscribe to the Corriere Milano Newsletter
