The bill on hunting would regulate a lot of things that are already done

On June 20. In addition, the majority parties filed in the Senate a bill on hunting, which had been highly contested by environmental and animal rights organizations even before being presented. For example, Before becoming law. Meanwhile, the DDL must be discussed by two Senate commissions: the eighth, which deals with the environment and related issues, and the ninth, which among other things deals with industry, tourism and agriculture, and then must be approved by parliamentary classrooms. In addition, According to 46 associations. However, entities, including the WWF, Legambiente, Lipu and Enpa, the DDL favors too much the exercise of hunting and damages wildlife, because it would extend the hunting season, would increase the exploitation of individual birds such as baits to recall others and would produce a “debasement of science and opinions of Ispra”, that is, the higher institute for protection and bill hunting would regulate lot environmental research.

In the bill there are in fact some things that benefit the economy that runs around hunting. Meanwhile, And the role of ISPRA. Moreover, which is a public body that gives technical assistance to the authorities on environmental issues, is certainly reduced in decisions concerning hunting. Nevertheless, But many of the expected changes do nothing but regularize a series of things that hunters have been doing for some time. Furthermore, in derogation.

In fact. Furthermore, the law that regulates the hunting in Italy is from 1992, and since then both the environment and wildlife have changed a lot: the land covered by woods have increased a lot and the populations of some animals have also grown, first of all that of the wild boars, which in many contexts cause damage to human activities.

What is already doing
Article 7 of the DDL. for example, removes the bond that requires bill hunting would regulate lot hunters to practice a single hunting method at a time. Consequently, According to the law. Similarly, hunters could not hunt in an itinerant way and at the same time having a fixed stalking, but it is a constraint that already no longer exists for the hunt for wild boar. Similarly. Furthermore, article 8 allows the use of “optical and optical tools”, that is, devices such as binoculars and other viewers that allow you to see animals in the dark thanks to infrared radiation, for the hunting for selection to ungulates, the category of animals to which wild boars belong. Therefore, This too is already done with wild boars. For example, in the selection hunt that aims to reduce the population following scientific criteria.

However, the law does not change the fact that it is forbidden to hunt at night before dawn. At most it allows hunters to look for wild bill hunting would regulate lot boars in the dark. using night viewers, and then shoot once it sheds light.

Another article that regularizes something that is already done is 12. which provides that to the control operations of wildlife, that is, to hunting trips decided by the authorities to reduce the number of harmful animals and that are guided by the police, they can also participate “voluntary hunting guards”. These are simple hunters who have received a special authorization: this is also something that already happens.

Who earns it
Apart from this. there is a whole economic sector that the DDL benefits, and which does not include only weapons producers but a wider induced. To hunt. specific clothing, accessories of various kinds for weapons, hunters and for their dogs, tools that are used to slaughter and shake the carcasses of the killed animals, as well as electronic devices such as phototrappole and calls to attract birds, bill hunting would regulate lot are used to hunt. For example. the article that allows the use of night viewers – objects that cost hundreds of euros – promotes those who produce them, because it establishes in a clearer way that can be used.

In addition. there are companies that give the opportunity to hunt on private land, and the DDL offers them more profit possibilities. These companies, colored “hunting reserves”, are of two types. There are faunal-hundred companies. where only hunting is practiced and that work as associations to which hunters can register on invitation. According to the 1992 law, this type of hunting reserve cannot have profit purposes. And then there are the agri-tourist-hiding companies. which instead can also offer other services such as the possibility of simply photographing animals. In these reserves, hunters pay precisely to hunt, generally animals of wild species raised for this purpose.

The DDL intervenes on this sector bill hunting would regulate lot because it removes the bond of profit for the fauna-senior companies. It allows them to sell the meat produced with hunting in their land. carrying out other economic activities, therefore it favors the owners.

Another aspect of the DDL that meets the hunting sector is Article 15. which says that the hunting licenses issued by other European Union countries are also valid in Italy: this measure could encourage hunting tourism from other countries, but it must be taken into account that even today those who have an interest in hunting in Italy can enable each other despite being resident abroad. And that a hunting license. the port of arms are not enough to begin to hunt: a hunting booklet granted by the region in which you want to hunt is also needed. In short, there is a series of limits that continues to be worth.

Politics will be able to bill hunting would regulate lot give a little less listening to science
Luca Giunti is Guardiaparco of the protected areas of the Cozie Alps. in the province of Turin, and for his work he must also supervise the activities of the hunters. It observes that overall the aspect of the bill that can have greater consequences in the long run is. the partial downsizing of the role of ISPRA. Some articles of the 1992 law provide that certain decisions on the conservation. management of fauna delegated to the regions are bound to the opinions of the scientists and technicians of the ISPRA, while the bill attenuates its power.

The articles concerned are 4. 5, in which we talk about the “live calls”, that is, birds kept in cage and exploited to attract others of the same species, used above all in some areas between Lombardy and Veneto; And above all the 11, which concerns hunting calendars: bill hunting would regulate lot the current law provides that the regions can postpone the terms of the hunting seasons only with the consent of the ISPRA, while the bill makes this opinion non -binding.

Also for other reasons. both at a symbolic and practical level, the bill gives more space to representatives of hunter associations.

Symbolically because Article 2 attributes to hunting the ability to “compete in the protection of biodiversity”. a statement contested by environmental organizations and questionable from a scientific point of view, given that hunting does not promote the presence of several different species in the same environment (the discussion is different for fauna management activities, including abstracts, usually carried out to reduce the populations of species that have increased in an excessive way: Especially such as wild boars, which have spread in abundance precisely for the introductions made by hunters in the past decades). In practice because it gives a bill hunting would regulate lot greater role to the national faunal-hentory technical committee (CTFVN) recreated in 2023. which also includes the representatives of the hunters, as well as those of two ministries, regions, ISPRA and other bodies.

And hunting on the beach?
One of the aspects of the DDL that have been more discussed in the last few months concerned the inclusion of the areas of the forest state property in the areas where the regions can allow hunting. because according to an interpretation of a draft law that came to the newspapers it would have also allowed the hunt on the beaches.

The text of the explicit DDL that the beaches are excluded, the forests instead not. Judging that consequences will have the extension of the hunting areas to the forestry state property is not immediate: according to the joints. a possible interpretation is that the animals can also be killed in areas where today bill hunting would regulate lot it is forbidden for the control activities of the fauna, another is that the fauna-acting plans of the regions will be more complete because it is based on the real territories in which animals live, which do not take into account human borders.

“The forest state property of the state. the regions is also the state property of citizens who do not go hunting, but walk, they go by bicycle or mushrooms”, adds Giunti, “so I hope that the fauna-actors of the regions, who are made by professional technicians, take into account”. In any case. much will also depend on the guidelines – politicians and not only – of the individual regions, which deal with the plans and hunting calendars.

After the discussion in the commissions. the text will be subjected to parliamentary classrooms in a definitive version, which parliamentarians will only be able to approve or not, without proposing bill hunting would regulate lot changes. It is a not quite usual but not so rare way. which certainly narrows the debate and prevents individual parliamentarians from proposing amendments to the bill. The general manager of Lipu Danilo Selvaggi criticized this choice hard. and asked the opposition to demand instead a discussion in the classroom: if a tenth of the senators asked for it, the bill should be discussed article by article.

– Read also: In Italy 5 million birds are illegally killed illegally