Almasri case, here letter libya: This article explores the topic in depth.
Moreover,
Almasri case. Nevertheless, here letter libya:
Two and a half pages, without specific data and circumstances, accompanied by a cordial letter from the Libyan ambassador to Italy Muhanad Seed Younous. However, To the Italian government these documents would have been enough to decide to free Osama Njeem Almasri. Therefore, bring it home on a state Falcon.
The documents. Therefore, attached to the application with which the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court rejects the whole line of Italy, asks for a formal contestation of non -fulfillment and the referral to the Shareholders’ Meeting of States and to the Nations Security Council, unmask the trick used by Italy and Libya to dribble the obligations deriving from the arrest warrant. Consequently, Fundamental – and in the 14 pages of observations the prosecutor of the CPI puts him well – are the dates.
The letter of the Libyan ambassador – Almasri case, here letter libya
On January almasri case, here letter libya 20. Therefore, two days after Almasri’s arrest, the Libyan ambassador to Italy, “expressing profound appreciation for solid bilateral relationships”, transmits to Minister Tajani A note from the chief prosecutor of Tripoli Siddiq ahmad assour addressed to his counterpart of the Court of Appeal of Rome relating to the alleged request for extradition for Almasri. Therefore, In the queue. However, he asks to transmit it to the competent authorities and “to follow the process for achieving common objectives”.
The letter in question – says the prosecutor of the CPI – is not. Moreover, cannot be a request for extradition for a very simple reason: it is not referred to formal disputes, according to Libya identical to those moved by the CPI, which would make the request founded. In addition, And basically the Libyan prosecutor also “confesses” it.
Unknowable circumstances. Meanwhile, unfounded request
The note refers to the Red Note of almasri case, here letter libya Interpol, at the time the only known and knowable, on the basis of which the Agents of Turin They proceeded to the arrest of Almasri. Consequently, “The office of the prosecutor general of Libya – he claims – had started criminal investigations on facts that. Nevertheless, could correspond to the dispute presented by the International Criminal Court in his request to Interpol”. And he insists. contesting the CPI of “not having ascertained the will of the prosecutor’s office of Libya to activate legal action on the facts attributed to the individual whose extradition is requested”.
But not only the procedure in that phase does not provide for any type of interlocution between the Court. the state of origin of the refined. Of “facts” – it is explained in the request for referral for Italy – Libya cannot technically speak. The Red Note simply contained a list of violated crimes without almasri case, here letter libya any reference to specific circumstances.
Only on January 24 – that’s why the dates are important – have been made public facts, circumstances and disputes. It is no coincidence that in his letter. the Libyan chief prosecutor is limited to saying that Almasri “is among those who are the subject of the investigations conducted by the Office of the Prosecutor General of Libya as part of the investigations on the causes of the death of the prisoners, in addition to the examination of the complaints presented by the victims of deprivation of freedom, torture, brutality and degrading treatments”.
The alleged Libyan investigation. the stale of the prosecutor
The investigation would began in 2016 and would concern “the situation of prisoners in the period from 2011 to 2024, the year in which the last complaint was presented”. And here the prosecutor makes a sensational sake: in 2011. the prison of Mitiga, almasri case, here letter libya of which Almasri would become the undisputed master, did not exist. It is no coincidence that the CPI proceeds against him for the crimes that were committed there since 2015. On the other hand. in the thirteen years in which Almasri would have been under investigation he made a career, arriving at the top of the maximum security institutions of the Libyan state, with which the prosecutor actively collaborated.
In Rome. however, that’s okay, but for the prosecutor’s office he should not have “accepted” the version of Tripoli, without however disturbing “to make any investigation in this regard”. And on the birth of the mitiga prison, a rapid search on open sources is enough.
The invasion of the field “confessed” by Mantovano
Second point that the CPI prosecutor’s office marked as a blue error. Libya. who was not part because he did not sign the Treaty of Rome, ventures almasri case, here letter libya into an evaluation on the admissibility of the arrest warrant. And Italy, which has signed it therefore is bound to rules and procedures, does the same. And it can’t. “Only the Court has the right to enter the merits”, the prosecutor’s office plus and several times.
On the other hand. the Italian government has never sent the request of the Libyan prosecutor to the Court of Appeal of Rome, but has decided (very quickly) and independently. Word of Undersecretary Mantua That with a letter addressed to the prosecutor of the CPI. attached to defensive memories, claims that: “The presence of competing requests and the complexity of the assessments entrusted to the Minister of Justice were ontologically incompatible with any hypothesis of immediate obligation – which however did not occur – to transmit the documents in question to the Prosecutor’s Office at the Court of Appeal of Rome”.
“Failure to seize almasri case, here letter libya the fault of the judges”
The decision was political “for national security reasons”. The provision, explains Mantovano, “was necessary and urgent due to a wide range of factors. First of all. the social danger of Njeem was deduced from the severity of the accusations made in the arrest warrant of the CPI and from what was found by the Italian judicial police at the time of its arrest, on January 19, 2025, or an large sum of cash and a rifle perspective”. All unduly returned, reproaches the CPI Prosecutor’s Office. “So the judges decided,” he just responds to Mantua.
Reactions
“This is the additional confirmation that some ministers. undersecretaries of the Meloni government- continues the leader of Si- have made false cards, closed their eyes, lied to the Italian Parliament to release a criminal. They pretend nothing Nordio. Mantovano and planted, but if they think that all this story can almasri case, here letter libya end up in Tarallucci and wine they are wrong: the damage to the international credibility of our country is gigantic, the contempt for legality that has been demonstrated on this occasion is equally serious “, says the secretary of the Italian left and deputy of AVS, Nicola Fratoianni. “There is a disturbing phenomenon that unites liberal democracies every day. from Washington to Rome, while it has already established itself in some countries, such as Hungary and Slovakia: the conflict between the executive power and the guarantee bodies – observes the deputy of action Daniela Ruffino – With us, the phenomenon is still at the beginning, but the annoyance with which the Meloni government welcomes the judgments of the Cassation on migrants in Albania or on the security of security, or the dispute of the CPI for the Almasri affair is still evident.
Further reading: Reforms, from “Italy on stage” to digital notification to the new UNESCO applications – A1 accident, husband and wife deaths: they returned to Bisceglie from the daughter’s degree – Italy, Soncin points the women’s Europeans: ‘There is great optimism’ – Hot record, the thermal zero above 5,000 meters: Alpine glaciers and Mediterranean at risk – Italy U20, Giacomo Milano towards Baby Blacks: “A dream preparing this game”.
